As Web 2.0 Grows, Some Freedoms Erode
by
on April 25, 2007,
Today, a headline on BBC News read, “China leader urges net crackdown.” The story’s summary reads something to the effect that Chinese President Hu Jintao is now requiring that the Internet accessible by millions of now regularly connected countrymen and women be purged of “unhealthy” content. Of course, this comes after a myriad of dailies and weeklies in various parts of the world (not the least of which the United States) had spent a good deal of time, paper and bandwidth pondering the newfound openness of the governing party when faced with internal statistics that show rapid growth of Internet use on the mainland.
So what is it? Are they seeing the light, or aren’t they? Will there be more freedoms granted, or not? If your gut leans toward the latter options, you’re probably far more in the right than the people who guestimate the opposite.
It seems as if the Chinese government - at least after Hu Jintao’s insistence that China’s naughty Web bandits shape up and get their act in line - is in a rut. Playing both sides of the aisle, perhaps. Sounds a bit like some policy makers (or policy breakers, if you will) over here in the Western world, eh?
If only the call for stringency was a China-only initiative. (That isn’t said to castigate the Chinese, only to lead into the point I’m about to make.) Governments all over the world are cracking down on wandering eyes confronted with the entire breadth of the Net. From the Middle East to the African continent to, yes, China, authorities are taking it upon themselves to silence bloggers and others who don’t speak well of their countries’ leaders, elected or not, or their policies, or anything else, really.
Stories of dissidents leaving their homelands and prison sentences being passed onto unruly keyboardists are now a regular topic of discussion, and have risen so frequently that the media rights group Reporters Without Borders have taken it upon themselves to publish an already-much-talked-about volume titled The Handbook for Bloggers and Cyber-Dissidents.
(We’re not sure whether the title is replaced by one which appears a tad more friendly to the prying eyes working for the not-so-laissez-faire regimes.)
David Reid, a reporter for BBC Click, has expounded on the subject of rights now available and unavailable to people in lands shrouded in controversy at the same time that attempts are being made by nations to remain relevant and technologically erudite in the eyes of the world at large.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!
kalipso
Mav
Orient expresS
Opensource 
Michael Fidler 
I can’t stand censorship of any kind on the Internet. I feel for the Chinese and other people who live in countries where the government tries to impose censorship. I only hope one day they will let there people be free. As we know though censorship doesn’t work. There is always a way around it.
“over here in the Western world, eh?” Definably a Canadian implication if I ever seen one. That being my visual interpretation could I dare say it is more a finger toward present Conservative polices vs past Liberal mis-guided deeds, eh?
More to the point I found the wording of the article at hand interesting to the point you have increased my desire to know more as opposed to the minor tease you dangled before us.
Well done, a great intro and hook, interesting to the point that leaves one wanting more. Perhaps that was your intent to draw us back for future tidbits on the topic at hand, “As Web 2 Grows, Some freedoms Erode”? I must be honest, I had never contemplated such a theory until I read your article, now it has me truly thinking, “What if…!”
web 2.0 thoughts - The stats very clearly show that less then 1% of web users do things like build personal profiles while 99% browse. On youtube, much less then 1% actually make and upload videos while more then 99% watch….dont drink the koolaid because nothing has changed. People basically like to watch, just like they did 70 year ago when TV first came out.