Dissection Of SoundExchange’s ‘Change Of Heart’

Paul Glazowski,


There’s still quite a bit of noise traveling to and fro on the Web about SoundExchange’s perceived 11th-hour “change of heart” last Thursday evening, concerning Webcasters and the company’s proposed royalty rate hike increase. The new numbers were to be put into effect today, though it would be tomorrow – Monday July 16th 2007 – that Webcasters both big and small and in between would begin to pay increased amounts plus fees established retroactively to 2006. The rates were to be increased year after year through to 2010, beginning at 0.11 cents per track (per listener) this year and going up to 0.19 CPT in 2010. Also originally pushed by SoundExchange was a $500 payment to be required of Webcasters per Web “channel” they happened to operate. In short, that would mean Webcasters, no matter how small, would have to pay $500, even if the sum of the fees they would pay (with the rate hike taken into account) was in fact smaller than $500.

Following SoundExchange’s decision to shelve it’s controversial plans hours before those plans were to be officially put into effect, Webcasters and their allies rejoiced, as it was then clear that the mass shutdown presumed to be forced to occur throughout the world of Internet would not take place. (Some Web-based outfits did close prior to the announcement, however.)

But, as is generally the case, closer investigation of the matter involving SoundExchange, Webcasters, and Congress was performed by a myriad of folk. One such individual was CNET’s Anne Broache, who fittingly assembled a list of FAQs and a corresponding set of answers, which we very much urge you all to read and consider.

The write-up is hardly elementary in its structure. In fact, Ms Broache is quite detailed in many of her answers to various queries about the topic. But she also puts it together for all to understand, which we emphatically commend. Whether it’s the basics or a number of particulars that the public continues to scratch its collective head over, Broache has it covered. The deadline. Webcasters’ reactions to last week’s news. What each respective party involved in the ongoing discussions will seek in the months to come. Everything, really.

No need for us to go on further. Known aspects of the issue are already assembled in very edible form. Make your way over to CNET’s dissection of the SoundExchange-Webcasters-Congress discussion now. And please do let us know what you make of this subject. We very much want to hear your various perspectives.


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!
0 Comments (Subscribe to rss)
  • No comments

Leave a comment (We support avatars from Gravatar, MyBlogLog, and FriendFeed)