Hakia Challenge - What Could Be More Relevant?
by
on September 22, 2007,
My good friend Dr. Riza Berkan just clued me in to a new comparative feature at hakia where users can test hakia against various search engines side-by-side. This feature has been on the hakia site for a little while but Riza and hakia have not publicized it and I thought our readers would be interested. Hakia has been under the radar fora little while now, so I was really glad to get a note from Riza and some cool news to boot. The challenge link can be accessed here or from the hakia main page.
Me and Hakia
As you probably already know hakia's semantic search engine has been one of my favorite topics on Profy and other tech blogs as well. Hakia began its quest for better search in the open where anyone could see the engine's progress along the path to a true semantic relevance. This has obviously been a double edged sword as early detractors could point out that results were initially not a lot better than any other engine's. I initially found hakia's transparency to be symbolic of something truly extraordinary. Subsequent discussions with Riza and hakia's President Melek Pulatkonak have fortified my belief in this particular company and semantic search in general.

Comparison and Decision
Hakia just recently updated their beta with what is coded as Beta 16 of a 20 step development plan aimed at 20-20 visual clarity in search. This simply means that with this update hakia is roughly 75 percent complete. Hakia has also provided a method by which users and passers by can actually compare their results to those of Google, Yahoo! and Live.com. This challenge is another example of both the quality and transparency of this development and also the spirit of the people behind hakia. I think an honest test of the relative capabilities of hakia via this challenge will reveal significant results. Hakia is already more relevant than Google and has been for some time, but it is YOU that has to make this kind of determination.
Friends Romans Countrymen
I do not think that we too often consider the travail of some of these great innovations we are seeing arise on the Web. Consider what hakia, Powerset and others are trying to accomplish. Hakia is not “simply” making a more relevant search engine - it is starting a revolution. These sets of ideas for semantic search and giving users real answers is more difficult than even the AI inherent inside these engines. Hakia and others are revolting against convention, symbols, skepticism and most significantly an immense power structure. Yes, though Riza would never presume to diminish any other excellent entity - hakia is challenging the hierarchy of Google and Yahoo. We are not just talking about the search engine Google, for hakia and others have already surpassed that for the most part - but approaching or surpassing any arm of this immense Web power structure does not make the job any easier (more on that in another post).
No BS
I believe in transparency - it is the cornerstone of truth and true value. The people at hakia are my friends obviously - there is no subterfuge going on in any of my discourses about them and other startups. This in no way affects my objectivity because I would as readily criticize their faults as I would Google's because I know they would welcome the feedback. I do not think their initial transparency has helped them in the short term for instance - but in the long term this will be irrelevant. Joost, Powerset and a host of others we could term “surprise” developments are not wrong in “baiting” the Web with tidbits and tantalizing chocolate morsels. As for my part in all this I am not prepared to see the good that ANY excellent people do interred with their bones as may have been the case with Gaius Julius Caesar.
Conclusion
In the final analysis this “competition” and the goal of hakia is adding more meaning for people. Hakia has already done that to a large extent, you should allow them to add value and meaning to your search regardless of convention - compare 75 percent of something truly excellent to 100 percent of something you are used to using. The rest of the blog world has not adopted these alternative and highly controversial developments as readily as I have - this is another example of convention vs true innovation. Web 2.0 is supposed to be about stepping into the next realm of connectedness and meaning - my version of it these months has resided far astride of any conventional thinking. In the end I believe yours has too.








