You Never Get a Second Chance at a First Impression
by
on April 02, 2008,
This post really should have a subtitle of “What should you be doing when it comes to customer service?” because it's one of the most crucial ways that a company can screw it up. Mistakes happen, and it's often overwhelming dealing with unhappy or unsatisfied customers. But meeting at least a bare minimum expectation can go a long way toward increasing a user base, and going the extra mile goes even farther.
I can think of several instances where companies have gone out of their way to respond to customer issues. Twice I've used Twitter to vent frustrations when testing an application for review and had amazingly quick responses from Socialthing as well as Toluu about the issues I was having. (Although my Toluu issues haven't been resolved yet.) FriendFeed has had similar reactions, implementing features that users were begging for faster than I've seen most companies respond. SheGeeks reports a similar experience with Disqus, who not only replied to a request, but also took the time to check out her blog and notice an issue with her WordPress install that created an issue with Disqus. You can't beat that kind of free advertising. When start-ups are sitting there discussing how to get their product on TechCrunch, maybe they should instead be doing things like this and creating that word-of-mouth goodwill that may take them farther in the long term.
When it comes to less-than-stellar customer service and response, I've actually seen two similar examples in the past 24 hours. The first was my own response from b5media after I talked about them in a post yesterday, and mentioned in my disclosure that I had, on occasion, applied to the network but never received a response. I generally only apply for writing positions when it's something totally different than what I write about here at Profy, and it's also something I feel passionate about, because I'm not very good at writing about things I don't care about. So if I've seen a blog opening at b5 that speaks to a passion, I've applied. Jeremy Wright responded to my blog post, and not long after his comment appeared, I received my rejection letter for my application to blog about green business on his network. I'll apologize in advance for the giant eye roll, but the excuse “we get too many applicants” doesn't fly with me. In this age of electronic communications, it's not that difficult to cull the email addresses of those who apply and send out a bulk email (or gosh, even an automated email using the person's name) thanking them for their application and letting them know that the position has been filled. By the time someone has blogged about it, and you reply in the comments, it's already out there.
Scribd is probably learning that same lesson today. A rant about the lack of a response when a user discovered a bug was featured on Hacker News, which results in a decent amount of traffic to the post, I'd assume. It doesn't matter whether you think the rant was off-base, or the date of the piece is old, or you see that one of the founders commented back; you've already seen the complaint and it registers somewhere in your perception of a company. Everyone is busy, but sometimes taking that 5 minutes at the outset will save all the effort it takes to smooth things over afterward.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!









Hi Cyndy,
I do my best to respond to the issues people are having with Toluu as quickly as I can, I am totally blown away with the amazing response we have been getting, so I feel it is the least I can do. I agree that FriendFeed and Socialthing! are also doing things right.
Cheers,
Caleb
Cyndi,
You’re absolutely right. Once a person makes up their mind about a company/product/service, it’s more difficult to persuade them to think otherwise.
Unfortunately, your first few experiences with b5 hasn’t been all that positive. Can’t really blame you for that giant eye roll. I might feel the same way if I were in your shoes. And, as I’ve mentioned in your other post, the number of applications, etc. we receive isn’t necessarily an excuse. It is an issue that we have been discussing and working on. The solution may seem easy, but actual implementation of ideas isn’t always as simple. If it were, we would have way more features on b5 by now!
The thing is, while these type of issues do occur, I think they’re more exceptions rather than the norm. Otherwise, we wouldn’t be able to hire enough bloggers who stay on with us if we simply ignore emails/applications.
Again, if you do wish to follow-up/get someone’s attention from b5, you’re definitely more than welcome to contact us. Not just through email, but by other means too (Twitter, etc).
We may never make it up to you, but it doesn’t mean we’ll stop caring.
Caleb, I understand that you have been working on the issues I’ve experienced and I appreciate that when you find a resolution, you let me know as soon as I can try again! That’s the type of response that I think goes much further in fostering happy customers.
Shai, I’ll be blunt; I think it’s about priorities. We both know that of those 5000 applications b5 gets, the majority of them are people who can’t write their way out of a paper bag, but hear there’s great money in blogging and anyone can do it. That being said, I do think that there are probably people who are applying who are great writers that get overlooked. It’s the way of the world that you often miss amazing candidates simply because of how application processes work. But when those applicants get ignored along with the chaff, their experience is colored, and many probably won’t apply again. At some point, the quality of candidates on the whole will suffer. As I said, I only applied when it was a topic I really felt passionate about, as I personally have not had positive experiences with working for blog networks on the whole, but I have been impressed with some of the b5 bloggers I subscribe to, like Kristina Chew.
In the overall scheme of making an impression, it’s a huge piece of the puzzle. A user (or applicant) feels devalued, forms an opinion of the company or service, and that colors every reaction they have to that company/service in the future. So much of whether a company succeeds or fails in the Web 2.0 world is dependent on that word of mouth buzz that I think no company can afford to screw up when it comes to making that great first impression.