<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BuzzLogic Buys BlogRovr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://profy.com/2008/04/22/blogrovr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://profy.com/2008/04/22/blogrovr/</link>
	<description>Internet news and commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 16:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Poston</title>
		<link>http://profy.com/2008/04/22/blogrovr/#comment-508991</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Poston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profy.com/2008/04/22/blogrovr/#comment-508991</guid>
		<description>Thanks for coming by. I agree that the positive outweighs any concern about DP and ad intrusion. I mainly like the deal because of the example it sets for turning a Web 2.0 concept into a useful, paying business - we don't see that often enough online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for coming by. I agree that the positive outweighs any concern about DP and ad intrusion. I mainly like the deal because of the example it sets for turning a Web 2.0 concept into a useful, paying business - we don&#8217;t see that often enough online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Sini</title>
		<link>http://profy.com/2008/04/22/blogrovr/#comment-508541</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Sini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 17:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://profy.com/2008/04/22/blogrovr/#comment-508541</guid>
		<description>Leslie, thanks for the kind words: we certainly think that the positive implications of the deal for users far outweigh any negative ones (hey, I can't think of any, in fact). Indeed, data portability issues are something we've generally paid close attention to, at the very least as users of the multiple social networks out there. When it comes to attention data, it's interesting to explore the possibility. Marshall Kirkpatrick over at Read/WriteWeb sets the conversation up nicely - I tend to think the value to users and in fact anyone is less in the raw clickstream than in the many unique ways it can be processed and give value back to users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leslie, thanks for the kind words: we certainly think that the positive implications of the deal for users far outweigh any negative ones (hey, I can&#8217;t think of any, in fact). Indeed, data portability issues are something we&#8217;ve generally paid close attention to, at the very least as users of the multiple social networks out there. When it comes to attention data, it&#8217;s interesting to explore the possibility. Marshall Kirkpatrick over at Read/WriteWeb sets the conversation up nicely - I tend to think the value to users and in fact anyone is less in the raw clickstream than in the many unique ways it can be processed and give value back to users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
