Why Your Start-Up Needs a PR Person

Cyndy Aleo-Carreira,


I watched the bitchmeme today float over the blogs and Techmeme with a wry grin and a shake of my head. Twitter has had a horrible week: the downtime and missing features continue. The users are revolting, posting blog posts and FriendFeed items threatening defection at every new development. The first complaints were that the folks at Twitter didn't communicate enough, and now the problem is that the communication is that of developers on the defensive, with a different reason given every day for the issues. The bitchmeme today centered on Robert Scoble, formerly one of Twitter's most vocal supporters and certainly its most active user, taking Alex Payne's remarks personally, and everyone else lined up on one side or the other of the argument.

I found myself in the very strange position of supporting Scoble, but not for the reasons that it seemed others did. Yes, those with huge lists of contacts and insane amounts of activity are a huge suck on an overtaxed system, and that would be true of any application, not just Twitter. Payne was simply stating a fact, one of many issues that they are currently facing right now. Any developer would have said the same thing when queried.

The problem, however, is that developers will tell you exactly what they are thinking about what's wrong, and what could be fixed, and it's a rare developer who thinks about how users would react to their responses. Generally, that's why there is someone else who steps in to face the customer in a software company, or in this case, the user.

Web 2.0 companies are so often bootstrapped that marking and public relations seem like a frivolous expense. Programmers and servers are the necessities, so it's tempting to view everything else as something you just can't afford. But Twitter is learning the hard way that it's simply not the case.

Public relations isn't just about the launch and the press releases and getting bloggers to pay attention to your app. It's about giving you a unified message that goes out to your userbase. It's about vetting comments that often go from brain to mouth with no filter. The developers are frustrated, and that's apparent. The users are frustrated as well. But a simple message accepting responsibility and promising a fix is the only thing that consistently helps companies to save face and win back customer loyalty. "We're sorry. We screwed up. We'll make it right." It's the reason that there are people who specialize in damage control in the non-tech business world. And companies may want to rethink prioritizing in boot-strapping, because sometimes you just need the help of someone whose profession is being tactful and playing nice with the users. They may save more than you spend on them.


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!
3 Comments (Subscribe to rss)
  • Cyndy, I was thinking about writing a post along these lines, but you have already covered everything a whole lot better than I would have.

    In my view, Twitter’s business issues are more critical than its technological issues. They’ve made some great strides over the last couple of weeks with their openness and quick responses when things go down. Apparently this thing got smoothed over, but it took a special video interview to set things right.

    Not that Payne did anything wrong. His job is to identify technical issues, and he identified technical issues.

    Incidentally, while Alex Payne was certainly speaking from a technical point of view, I personally believe that the issue escalated because of MG Siegler’s spin on the remarks, not on what Payne said.

  • No GravatarCyndy Aleo-Carreira - May 31, 2008 at 06:48 am PDT

    Ontario, thank you! I think they have a two-pronged issue: the tech issues that they can’t seem to figure out, which ties into the business issues. They’ve been more open, but that transparency is making it pretty obvious that they don’t seem to have a clue, since the “reason” for outages changes every time they say anything.

    I’m sure that MG’s article fed the fuel, but again, it’s why you don’t let developers talk to people. That quote, regardless of the headline, would have caught the attention of the power users. My guess is that if he hadn’t used Scoble in the headline, you probably would have also seen Calacanis complaining. Probably not Gary Vaynerchuk, although he is also up there as well with nearly 10,000 followers, although he isn’t following as many (a mere 1400), but that’s only because he generally isn’t negative about anything.

  • Cyndy, you’re absolutely right. When it comes to sites and apps like Twitter, technical problems can be easily forgiven. PR gaffes, however, tend to cause much more damage. I don’t think I’m alone in saying I’m more concerned about Twitter’s response to their downtime than the downtime itself.

    Although I will admit the cute new whale picture helps.

Leave a comment (We support avatars from Gravatar, MyBlogLog, and FriendFeed)