Another New York Attorney General, Another Sex-Related Crisis to Solve
by
on June 11, 2008,
I apologize in advance for the New-York-centric posts when it comes to Internet-related legislation, since that is usually the domain of Center Networks. However, I live in New York, and I feel duty-bound to comment on what happens here so that the rest of the U.S. and other countries can try to lobby their governments to prevent the same stupidity from occurring where they live.
It seems like only yesterday that New Yorkers were enjoying the fruits of Attorney General Eliot Spitzer's labors over prostitution rings. And we all know what happened there, now, don't we? Well, our new Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo is going after child pornography, and the first step? Usenet.
Yes, that's right, Usenet. The precursor of Web forums, Usenet groups are "host to this immoral business" according to Cuomo. And with that sword rattling, he has convinced Time Warner Cable to announce that they will ban customers from accessing any Usenet newsgroups. Sprint is only banning the alt.* groups, and Verizon is being vague about what they will ban, saying only "fairly broad newsgroup areas."
I've previously talked about using anonymizing proxies in countries where Internet access is censored; who knew I'd be recommending it for use in my own country? The dumbest part of this whole thing is that over "several month" the AG's task force found only 88 groups that contained child pornography, so it definitely makes sense to throw the baby out with the bathwater, right?
I'll readily admit that I haven't had time for Usenet in years, but I was active on several groups back in the day, and never had any contact with porn on any of them. The National Center for Missing and Exploited Children gets in on the act, claiming that this move is going to "[cut] online porn off at the source."
Do any of these agencies actually have anyone who has any common sense involved with coming up with these "feel good" policies that don't do a single thing?
Discussions of child pornography make headlines, and I'm sure that's what Cuomo is counting on. But someone needs to explain how preventing access to alt.barney.die.die.die is going to stop children from being abused. Anyone know?
The Internet is quickly becoming an easy target for useless legislation that fools voters into thinking their elected officials are actually doing something. I'd far rather my tax dollars go to tracking people who DO upload porn to newsgroups and sell images and arresting them at the REAL source, which would be the people creating the illegal materials in the first place. All this will do is flush people to a new location, and unless they shut down the entire Internet (and I hope I didn't give Cuomo any ideas there), not a single thing will change other than a lot of irate customers who can't access their newsgroups.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!










My feeling is that although the crimes should be addressed, and precautions should be taken, the outright removal of ALL newsgroups seems entirely unfair. There are plenty of newsgroups that are completely legitimate. Microsoft, Apple, Google and even our Government all have newsgroup relations. TO kill this access to information seems a great deal overboard.
FOr me, this was the final straw. TWC was only kept around as my ISP because of Usenet access. Without this, I am leaving. I joined http://www.newsdemon.com and they’re actually better than any usenet access that Ive had with an ISP, or with any other Usenet provider for that matter.
Now the mission is to find another ISP that has my interest in mind rather than one that takes advantage of a situation in order to cut costs on bandwidth.
D. Linus
David, I totally agree that the crimes should be addressed, but as another article I saw this week noted, all this does is drive the offenders further underground. It makes a nice news story, gains notoriety for Cuomo, and does NOTHING to solve the underlying problem.
Bah.
If you think it’s about child pornography, think again. If you think it’s about bandwidth, think again. What it’s REALLY about is pressure from media owners over distribution of copyrighted works in the usenet alt.binary.* heiarchy subset. No more MP3s, bootleg pre-release movies, etc. In fact, one of the most recent newsgroups Verizon’s servers has picked up is “alt.binaries.blu-ray”.
These are backroom handshake deals that have ISPs shutting down binary capabilities in exchange for “hold-harmless” writs and promises not to litigate the ISPs for enabling illegal trading of copyrighted work.
The “war on the exploitation of children” story is a disingenous and shallow cover for evading things far less sinister but far more pervasive.
Oh, and just in case you think I’m nuts … (well maybe)
http://www.newsgroupreviews.com/RIAA-Targets-Usenet.html