Misuse of Social Media: Social Implies Human Interaction, People!

Cyndy Aleo-Carreira,


Today hasn't been a super-happy day on the Web, with sad news coming from every angle, it seems. The escaped "Spam King" killed himself in a horrifying murder-suicide, and "The Last Lecture" professor Randy Pausch lost his battle with pancreatic cancer.

Spending all of my online time using either social media tools or reading news, I'm used to the typical reactions to news that you'll see on Twitter or in blog postings, or so I thought. I'm confused, however, with what people think is appropriate or not appropriate when using social media to express their feelings about a recent news event.

Take, for example, the comments received today on Ian Lamont's post about Pausch's death. I understand that death of a public figure results in feelings of grief that often seem to have no outlet, but the use of the comments option on a tech blog to express sympathy wishes to the deceased's family just doesn't connect. Do people assume that the family will cull every bit of information about the deceased and find these well-wishes? Do the commenters leave similar comments on every blog that carries the story? Does anyone stop and wonder if possibly a better place to leave condolences would be the very-easy-to-find link at Tributes.com, which links up to his obituary, where the family might actually see it? It's a handy sponsored link right in the sidebar on Google.

The second completely mind-boggling use of social media today was by The Inquirer. Now, I know that there is a market for snarky commentary on news events, and I'm often guilty of that same level of sarcasm at times. There is a point, however, that I think most people would accept that you don't cross, and The Inquirer crossed it. The commentary about the "Spam King's" death? "Comment Yay. No, YAY!" A quote from the article seals it:

 

While it is hard not to feel bad for his brutally murdered wife and child, not to mention his wounded daughter, Eddie's suicide itself is the stuff of happy thoughts. Every deceased spammer is a million fewer in-box-clogging, malware-infested mails a day, so lets tip one back for liberal gun laws.

 

Yes, by all means, let's tip one back for liberal gun laws that seriously wounded a teenager, killed a three-year-old little girl, and left a 7-month-old baby in a hot truck, dehydrated. I've often suggested stringing spammers up by their toes and letting anyone with an email account play piñata, but I don't recall ever even suggesting that it involve an innocent toddler. Eddie Davidson's death isnt anything that should be celebrated, even if you do consider spammers to be wasting the oxygen they breathe.

The stories may not seem connected, but to me, they both highlighted the fact that all this use of online tools may be distancing us from the very humanity they are supposed to be helping us interact with. The Internet gives us so many interesting ways to interact with other people. We just need to keep in mind that we are actually interacting with people, and there's still a right and a wrong way to do that.