Surprise: Women Care Less about Business, More about Friendship!

Svetlana Gladkova,


Facebook or LinkedIn? Friendship or Business?What a surprise, really! A study released by reputation management service RapLeaf (our previous coverage) reveals that there are more women than men on all the major social networks the exception of LinkedIn and Perfspot.

RapLeaf studied over 49 million people based on the publicly available data to understand social networking trends and their relation to gender and age of internet users. The social networks studied included Bebo, Blackplanet, Classmates, Facebook, Flickr, Flixter, Friendster, Hi5, LinkedIn, Multiply, MySpace, myYearbook, Perfspot, Tickle. The 49 million of people in the selection were split between 24.8 million women, 20.6 million men while 3.9 million preferred to keep their gender to themselves. The results of the study may not be valid globally since approximately 90% of those studied profiles belonged to US residents but the results are interesting anyway.

I am not sure about my personal opinion on the results of the study. It does not make me proud of female domination of the social networking field both in terms of volume and in terms of activity. Sure, I know that I can connect to much more women on social networks but I don't really care about the gender of my social networking friend - I normally care about the topics we could discuss and the level of conversation.

But there is one thing that I find disturbing - it looks like women really have more time to spend online that they use for activities that are not connected to career or business. The proof is simple: while the majority of the websites studied are mostly about entertainment and friendship with women clearly dominating these networks, the most business-oriented network of all the social networks, LinkedIn, has much less female users than male (320 thousand versus 459 thousand).

The reasons I can see here is that probably women have not yet realized the full potential of social networking for businesses and simply are not as business-oriented by their nature as men are. So right now social networking looks more like a hobby for young women that have nothing to do offline - the most active category on all the social networks are women aged 14 to 24.

Also there is one thing that I find quite comfortable - the study shows that the crazy friendship patterns of the technology-oriented world do not repeat themselves for average users. It is not really popular to have over thousand social networking friends - out of 49 million people studied less than 200 thousand had 1,001-10,000 friends and only 2,700 users had over 10,000 friends.

And in this category of hyper-connected people I am actually pleased to see slightly more men than women - 88,246 for women versus 90,803 for men.

And that's something that I feel very good about - at least for the majority of people it has not become a necessity to befriend thousands of people and they still enjoy real friendship and communications, even online (since I believe that in the most popular group where people have 2 to 25 friends these are real-life friends actually). So it is another proof that for mainstream users social networking maintained its initial purposes and has not become a measure to build a personal brand or broadcast their business message.

 


If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!
6 Comments (Subscribe to rss)
  • Interesting post!

    Thanks!
    http://www.linkedin.com/in/burda

  • It just reaffirms our natural, gender-specific instincts and tendencies: women are more nuturing and men are more goal-oriented, black and white (meaning, we have no grays, other than hair!).

    Of course, those are generalities, but still true looking at the entire male and female populations.

    It’s also likely proves why there are more (I assume) mommy bloggers than daddy bloggers — and why those moms are so valuable when it comes to marketing (with my evil marketer hat on).
    -Mike

  • No GravatarCyndy Aleo-Carreira - July 30, 2008 at 08:25 am PDT

    I’m pretty disappointed in Rapleaf. This study isn’t new; they released it over six weeks ago, and seem to have emphasized different aspects of it to justify a new press release. The conclusion isn’t anything new from what was released (and covered) when they first released it.

  • Mike, this is exactly my conclusion and this is why I titled my post with Surprise! Really, there is nothing new in women being less focused on business and more on relationships. Obviously, there are exceptions but the conclusion is generally true and it’s still good to see someone bothering to give us an extra proof of it.

    Cyndy, sure, they merely changed the focus a little to find a new reason to issue a press release but still I found this conclusion to be interesting enough for Profy readers.

  • I think we live in dangerous times, and I am not talking about the threat of wars, but the threat that we’ve become disconnected to the world around us, because these social networking sites allow you to create your own version of reality..

    SOME people, in lieu of a real life, have an online one…and studies like this prove it..

    There should be a rule, that for every hour we spend online, we will talk to an human being for at least a minute.

    People should give it a try…

    I’ve been to California twice on the last two months, and on my first trip I made a point of not carrying a laptop with me, and I had a lot of fun..and on the second trip I took a very small one, and only used it very occasionally..

  • @Jaime: Very interesting idea for the balance between online and offline lives. Unfortunately for people that have to work online and are often home-based, this is at the very least difficult. I’m not sure if calling one’s mom to discuss the day is a viable alternative to a real human conversation :) But great idea nevertheless, should really help some people overcome the addiction if generally accepted.

Leave a comment (We support avatars from Gravatar, MyBlogLog, and FriendFeed)