Another Company Builds a Business Model around Twitter – Marketplace for Twitter Ads
by
on September 02, 2008,
I wonder when Twitter will finally notice how many people come up with creative ways to use Twitter for business while Twitter keeps earning nothing at all off those millions of users participating in the micro-blogging community. Right now it looks like Twitter is determined to continue ignoring this same as it has been doing until now.
In the meanwhile today we are watching TwittAd covered on TechCrunch - and this will be sure to bring some initial visibility to the service. TwittAd is a marketplace to buy and sell ads on Twitter profiles. The idea is simple enough and almost makes sense: it works same as any ads marketplace helping bloggers sell ads if they are not able to reach potential advertisers directly.
So what TwittAd does is simply connecting a potential advertiser to an owner of a profile on Twitter and helping the profile owner sell an ad on his or her Twitter profile. The ads will be located in the normally empty left-hand column on your Twitter page. The ads served by TwittAds seem to be intended mostly for branding purposes as they don’t offer any links back to the advertiser’s site (unless the link is included in the image itself - but this can not be clicked anyway). TwittAds makes money by getting 5% commission on every ad sold.
After an advertiser makes a bid to place an ad on one of the Twitter profiles registered on the site (are we calling them Twitter publishers or twittershers here?), the publisher will have to approve the ad and manually upload the image to the profile layout. Probably this is the reason that I have only found two profiles sold (to the same advertiser actually) with already uploaded images.

The screenshot above also shows that advertisers risk not being noticed at all on the profiles if the profile owner chooses to abandon Twitter for a while: the latest user’s update is from 4 days ago about the profile sold on TwittAd.
I think some problems with TwittAd are obvious from the very beginning: first of all, it only takes the number of followers (along with the people you follow yourself) into account without paying attention to other factors, like frequency of updates, number of retweets you get from other users, or maybe page rank of your Twitter page. Unfortunately it is well-known that you can obtain a large number of followers by simply following multiple people and having some of them return the favor (it is not all that difficult to unfollow those that don’t so that you can continue adding new people and maintain a healthy follower/following ration) - but these people will not listen to you and will hardly ever land on your Twitter page again. Besides, it does not provide any targeting information to a potential advertiser since without any idea of what exactly you focus on in your tweets they will hardly be able to determine which audience they will reach via your account.
But the major problem with TwittAd is that it is not all that easy to sell ads on any online properties without relevant sales experience - even the best blog ads marketplaces face difficulties from time to time. And obviously this one is supposed to take a lot of persuasion to make potential advertisers believe they should have their brands exposed on Twitter at all.
Besides, knowing that the heaviest Twitter users rarely ever visit profiles of the people they follow instead using various desktop and mobile clients and checking their own timeline (which will not display any ads from other users), I can imagine potential advertisers will eventually figure out their ads don’t reach anyone but the twitter publishers themselves.
Anyway since I am pretty sure these ads will hardly have a chance of annoying anyone since they will mostly be visible to myself, I think I will run a small experiment here with TwittAd. I believe that with my current number of followers at a little over 1.5 thousand (and the existing pricing on the site other users expect to be paid by advertisers), $100 for a week of placing some ads along my profile (and all those incredibly clever thoughts of mine) sounds quite fair.
After I publish this post I will add myself as a publisher to TwittAds and will give it a month to see how it works (or if it works at all) to report the results here in one month. If I do earn anything from the experiment, I will use the entire amount to finance some micro-loans on Kiva to avoid any negative comments I may get about selling ads on my Twitter profile.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!










The Twitter creators are smart guys are they’re going to make sure Twitter doesn’t become old and tired. I think as Twitter evolves so will our interaction with it. If some people don’t click on profiles often now (I personally do) I think it’s shortsighted to say this model won’t work since I am certain Twitter will evolve and become more interactive. Also, as someone responsible for advertising for my company, this model has two advantages. First of all it’s cheap! $100 (on the high side) when I’m used to seeing thousands is definitely something to consider. Also, without the crutch of the ads being clickable and relying on a website to do all the work, it forces us to make the ad meaningful. Tell people something they should now. A band announcing tour dates, Clinique announcing their Bonus Days, McDonald’s announcing a new beverage. The moment I see the ad I am instantly informed of something new. I don’t need to “click” to hunt through a website to figure out what an Advertiser wants me to know. As Twitter evolves maybe ads can one day be clickable, but in the meantime I still think purchasing a few backgrounds for peanuts is something a lot of businesses will throw into their advertising mix.
Interested to see how it works out for you Svetlana. I think the issues you noted are very big issues since a lot of people use Twitter on the go.
Brian
http://www.konnects.com
@JA: Glad to see such an optimistic approach, hopefully Twitter and the services built around Twitter (like TwittAd) will actually live to your expectations.
But as an advertising person I think you must fully realize that $100 let go down the wind is worse than $1,000 resulting in $10,000 revenue. And unfortunately with TwittAd chances are the ads won’t be seen at all and definitely won’t be clicked since there’s nothing to click so this reduces the value. It may work for big brands as you’ve mentioned to make some big announcements but will the guys behind TwittAd be able to get those big brands on board? It is a new approach to online advertising, absolutely, something very similar to outside billboards mainly aimed at increasing brand awareness. And it must take some efforts to make this model work online.
P.S. Oh, and shoot me a note if you are really about wasting some money on ads, I can offer you a better ROI right here on Profy
@Brian: Anthony over at VentureBeat (see the 1st trackback to this post) expressed his opinion that ads won’t be seen at all much more precisely. But I will be sure to report the results of the experiment here (well, if I finally get my confirmation email from them).