Apple Did Not Enter the Low-End Notebooks Market. So What?
by
on October 15, 2008,
Yesterday was definitely a big day for Apple with Apple fans eagerly waiting for the presentation of the new notebooks. As usually, there were some people extremely happy about the presentation and already promising to sell their slightly used Macbooks to replace them with new versions and there are those that are equally unhappy about many things Apple has introduced. But in the current economic situation the most important people are stock holders, not the fans that will replace one expensive laptop with a newer expensive laptop out of loyalty to the brand.
And shareholders are thinking about revenue and market share, not about how excited existing users are. So everyone was eagerly waiting for Apple to introduce a notebook in the sub-$1,000 price market. And as it usually happens when something is viewed as very much needed addition, we received our share of rumors that such laptops will arrive. Experts insisted a lower-end laptop is exactly what Apple needs to stay competitive at the times when luxury is not something people will buy focusing on affordability instead. Some market analysts even predict that a Macbook priced at $900 could increase Apple’s addressable market by 67%.
It is definitely worth mentioning here that Macs (both desktops and notebooks) play the vital role as a revenue source for Apple as they represent the largest portion of all the sales the company makes - estimated 47% this year. And this reliance on notebooks makes every decision in this field extremely important - hence all the pricing rumors and speculations.
But now we know that Apple is not introducing any laptops priced below $1,000 (I hope no one thinks that $999 for the white plastic Macbook is actually in that category for the consumer) so the question is if Apple manages to keep its notebooks business healthy without listening to the market analysts demanding cheaper machines that will be viewed more as a necessity by consimers.
For the time being Apple has clearly demonstrated that the company is planning to stay in the upper market category where the profit margin is simply better. But after choosing this position Apple will have to face a huge consumer dilemma (a dilemma consumers will inevitably be pondering over in the unfavorable financial environment): is quality more important than affordability?
I personally don’t know how valid the idea that the upper market for desktops and laptops will not shrink in the economic downturn is but Apple definitely seems to be pretty self-confident. Where I see the company could gain is in significantly improving its Macbooks line - here is where consumers could turn to instead of Macbook Pros for a comparable quality for a significantly lower price. Also the specifications of the new Macbooks could make the laptops appealing to more people contemplating finally converting from a PC to a Mac: these people could be unwilling to buy an expensive machine from the very beginning but could buy the significantly enhanced Macbooks if they see enough value.
It is hard to tell for now if Apple’s decision to continue pursuing the up-market with Macbooks, Macbook Pros and Macbook Airs is a reasonable one or if listening to analytics and coming up with a cheaper option could be better, but if there’s one thing I know, it’s that at least Apple does not face any risks in using aluminum in their much-hyped “brick” manufacturing technology as the price of aluminum has been falling since July and will probably continue doing so:

As for the Apple’s stock price, I believe we were simply waiting for too long and expected to see some laptops for $800 too much to believe that Apple can still be healthy without introducing the sub-$1,000 machine focusing on value for the money instead of the affordability. So it was quite understandable that after gaining tremendous 13% on Monday, Apple’s shares were 5% lower by the time Steve Jobs and his team completed the presentation on Tuesday and the market closed at $104.
But that was predictable - speaking to some people yesterday I knew that the opinion was the usual “Buy on the rumor, sell on the news” with everyone expecting at least some kind of disappointment from the presentation. Nothing unusual or unexpected here so we’ll have to wait for the next week’s quarter earnings report from Apple to get more rumors, more news and more stock price fluctuations.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to profy RSS feed!









I don’t think Apple did a mistake sticking with upper market. Okay some people will be in trouble choosing between affordability and quality (esp. today) but if Apple leaves then who else will remain there? Price matters but more important for me is Apple keeping quality on higher level.
Anton, I guess your comment means you have never paid twice the price for Apple or Sony Vaio in Russia (despite the Russian name)
This is exactly my thought here - we can’t be sure people will actually stop buying Apple because affordability will mean more than quality. But in some cases prices should better be reasonable and not based on ridiculous profit margins.
Svetlana, you’re right, I’ve never paid twice for Apple production yet (despite living here). =) I know currently it’s cheaper to buy it in America but even if I can’t find a way to do this I’ll get a MacBook despite the price. Agree with your last statement, but… As of Russia I know some Apple users here will have mixed emotions about lowering prices (if it happens): they’ll lose their “speciality” as people around switch to Mac.
Anton, there are always ways to avoid paying twice as much in Russia for electronics - I myself am not planning to buy anything here simply because I don’t understand this pricing policy. And your words about Apple users are right on spot - exactly what it is, the speciality thing.
Finally, someone with some sense. Apple thinks long term. They do not cater to short term economic conditions simply because a few short term thinking bozos think it’s appropriate. Since when has an economic slowdown lasted forever?
I still have my job, my house, my car, my retirement account and my wife and kids. Nothing has changed in my life except for the fact that I don’t watch the news any more because I can’t take all the hyperbole. As a matter of fact I ordered a Macbook Pro for myself and a Macbook for my son just this morning. I still buy luxury items just as I always have and always will. Why does the media and others think that the world is on fire when myself and many others I know feel no effects at all other than a minor slip in portfolio value? In fact, I don’t know one single person that lost their house, their job, or their retirement account… not one.
Actually, Apple does offer a very inexpensive laptop for part of the year. Each year from about June through September they offer a $200 discount that is applied to the purchase of an iPod. This is on top of the education discount for students and teachers. So every summer anyone working at or attending school can get an Apple laptop with iPod for about $900. (I’m going on memory for the education discount.) Usually a free printer is also included.
Sean: I guess laptops is not the market where it is even possible to react to short-term economic conditions really fast as it takes long enough to prepare and release a new laptop and of course Apple could not be aware of the pending crisis when they started working on the notebooks that were released this week.
Actually I myself have already heard stories of people going bankrupt because of the crisis but I also prefer to try and be reasonable as panic will certainly not help fix the situation and the only thing it does is making it much worse than it could be. That’s what I’ve been telling from the very beginning: we don’t have to make it worse and a reasonable approach could be one of the measures to improve it.
John: I was not aware of the option available to buy an Apple laptop cheaper than usually, thanks for sharing. But that does not change the bigger picture here: Apple still remains an up-market product for many consumers.