|
The presence of a revenue model doesn’t ensure profitability; if the charges, usage or number of users has been overestimated, or the cost structure scales up faster than revenue growth, new ventures burn up their startup capital faster than expected, needing infusions to keep up the pace of growth. Bootstrapping or angel investors can only take it so far; the burn rate forces tough choices. |
Author Archive
Playing the GYMEAN Game
by
on November 15, 2006
Pay for Consumer Services?
by
on November 14, 2006
|
Transaction or subscription based models don’t have to be services targeting businesses. Consumers can and will pay for web services that meet their needs. A prime example is TheFamilyPost – a web service that gives families the option of storing photos and videos, creating an online scrapbook or presentation, a family website and chatroom, and more. |
Transaction Payment Revenue Models
by
on November 14, 2006
|
Per user payment models work fine when usage doesn’t vary significantly between users; usage being clustered close to an average. It starts to break down if some users can benefit much more than others; heavy users then get subsidized by light users, leading to two possible outcomes: either the light users break away to another less expensive alternative, or begin to waste the resources in a bid to redress that inequality. Both of these are inefficient options, driven by inefficiencies [...] |
Subscription Based Revenue Models
by
on November 13, 2006
|
As we saw yesterday, a “free plus ad supported” model makes most sense for consumer oriented activities; where the presence of a “non-free” offering means that most first time viewers will choose to stay away or opt for other free offerings instead. For businesses, however, the ad-supported approach may not make sense; a subscription style offering may be far better. Following the success of Salesforce.com and other web based services, a number of Web 2.0 businesses are exploring the subscription [...] |
Speculating About Business Models
by
on November 12, 2006
|
One downside of a “free plus ad-supported” business model is that it could impact the quality of the content offerings. On one side, free encourages anyone to take part – quite often, spam results. Blogspot is an example – the growth in the popularity of blogging, the importance Google gives to blogs in general and Blogspot in particular, and the fact that anyone can set up a free blog on blogspot, has led to an explosion of splogs. |
What’s Wrong With Ad-Supported?
by
on November 11, 2006
|
An ad-supported business model isn’t a bad one; plenty of sites do well with getting advertising to pay for costs, and even have a tidy sum left over. Many people have benefited from Google’s Adsense and other advertising networks, earning sufficient to devote themselves full time to webmastering. |
What’s The Revenue Model?
by
on November 10, 2006
|
The fundamental attributes of Web 2.0 (User Value, The Long Tail, Network Effects and Experience) mean that startup costs approach insignificance. Unlike dot-com boom startups, where investments needed to be significantly high to reach any kind of scale, the convergence of technology and community has made it accessible to almost anyone who wants to try. |
YouTube to Offer Revenue Sharing?
by
on November 10, 2006
|
How does a business grow its revenues? The two most common routes are either charging more per customer or growing the number of customers. Typically, charging more works better when the market reaches saturation – there are not many more new customers who can be enticed profitably. For a startup, growing the number of users becomes a no-brainer. |
Skype On A Mobile Phone
by
on November 09, 2006
|
?? |
That’s Money in 2.0 – Part 2
by
on November 08, 2006
|
Not every Web 2.0 venture is YouTube. Not many sites get the kind of user traction, page views and revenue growth that YouTube has seen. So isn’t YouTube an exception, with the normal run of Web 2.0 sites being unprofitable? |





