|
I have just bumped into an interesting post on Powerset blog about a small survey they have carried out to see students’ attitude towards Wikipedia. Powerset is a semantic search engine recently acquired by Microsoft. The first product launched by Powerset is the tool to search Wikipedia to get more relevant results using the power of natural language processing technologies. |
Posts Tagged with ‘wikipedia’
Students Advised by Professors not to Use Wikipedia
09/04/2008, 3 days 12 hours ago
- 10 Myths about Google Chrome Browser09/05/2008, 2 days 21 hours ago, 65 comments
- Is Google’s Chrome All about Advertising?09/07/2008, 14 hours 48 minutes ago, 31 comments
- Playing with Google Chrome – Too Simplistic or Perfectly Minimalist?09/02/2008, 5 days 4 hours ago, 21 comments
Why Do People Google “Internet”?
08/23/2008, 2 weeks 1 day ago
|
Recently I have noticed an interesting thing in the traffic stats for Profy. Specifically I have started to notice people arriving from Google (mostly) and some other search engines after they do a search for a single word - “internet”. And since I always find it amusing when people google “Google” to get the same link they are actually on (and yes, Google is quite a popular search term) I thought that googling “internet” was equally amusing. After all, what [...] |
China Forced To Partially Unblock Unwanted Websites. Will It Hurt Later?
08/02/2008, 1 month ago
|
Over this week we've been listening to the discussions about international media demanding that the Chinese government rethinks its position on blocking a number of websites that were (and most certainly still are) considered by the government as hazardous to their citizens and their states of mind. What we see now is that under this pressure China is simply forced to lift the restrictions to a certain extent - the extent that can be viewed as acceptable by [...] |
Is Wikipedia Reliable Enough for the U.S. Courts to Use?
07/30/2008, 1 month 1 week ago
|
The Volokh Conspiracy notes that courts have cited Wikipedia in decisions over 300 times. That's three hundred times that the user-created encyclopedia has been used in documents that become part of the public record. And while Eugene Volokh doesn't usually see a problem with this, one particular use by the Seventh Circuit demonstrates just how questionable the practice may be, depending on your view of user-generated content. |
Knol for Google: It Is Not Evil, It Is Business
07/29/2008, 1 month 1 week ago
|
Google is a smart company - smart enough for many people to be surprised after they witness this or that move or an acquisition, surprised enough to say "Why has not anyone thought of that move earlier?" And now it seems that Google has finally realized that it sends way too much traffic from its search results pages to websites that do not contribute to Google's business. What would be the correct move for a business when faced [...] |
Centrif — like all Wikis, Strong Idea, Implausible in Execution
07/24/2008, 1 month 2 weeks ago
|
I’m always game for a new search platform that offers a unique perspective on delivering search results. Even if they aren’t pulled off to perfection, good concepts are always worth a few laughs, at the very least. Centrif is a search platform that answers questions (reminiscent of Ask.com) with social bookmarks that users have submitted as fitting particular search queries. |
The Fine Line of User-Generated Content Ethics: Russert Leak Fired
06/23/2008, 2 months 2 weeks ago
|
Henry Blodget and Peter Kaftka are in an uproar. The person who changed Russert's Wikipedia entry was determined to be a lower-level employee at Internet Broadcasting Services, which is a company that provides web services to television stations. Apparently, the employee heard the reports, and felt it was his or her civic duty to update Wikipedia, assuming it was "common knowledge." |
It Makes Great Valleywag, but What Does Jimmy Mean for Safe Harbor?
05/20/2008, 3 months 2 weeks ago
|
The legal standing of much of Web 2.0 is based on the U.S. concept of safe harbor, which essentially means that no web site operator can be held accountable for anything posted on their site by the users. I'm no lawyer, and turned to an excellent breakdown of what safe harbor is and what laws ensure it from Eric Goldberg, Assistant Professor at the Santa Clara University School of Law, which he gave in an interview with ION Connection: |
Wikimedia, Meet the U.S. Government
05/08/2008, 4 months ago
|
Is anyone else getting the feeling that safe harbor legislation for sites that host user-generated content are going to be changing soon? |
Is Web 2.0 Out of Original Ideas?
04/09/2008, 5 months ago
|
The most heated bitchmeme of the past few days appears to be the flap over one of the featured apps on Google App Engine, called HuddleChat. Since removed from the site, Daring Fireball was the first to note that it bore a striking resemblance to 37signals' Campfire. |




